Thread:AbysmalShadows/@comment-1493741-20151117010054/@comment-2089817-20151118015721

It's hard to disagree with Z on that. You have to admit, Void, sometimes you do tend to voice your opinion in a way that seems to come off as forceful, even when you're not intending it to be. It's one of the reasons behind why you and I have butted heads in the past as well, so I do sorta get where Z is coming from.

That being said, Z. You too seem to have jumped way too quickly to conclusions. You threw the first stone when you said, "Well, it limits you, but that's why its not your interpretation." If you are open to a discussion about your material, immediately jumping to the "it's my interpretation, deal with it" answer isn't exactly a respectable choice. Furthermore, I have to agree with Void that there is a really unnecessarily complex element to your background; particularly, around the first and second paragraphs. It doesn't make you wrong, by any means, but since you're open to discussion, I have to assume that means you are also willing to reconsider your interpretation and change it as the discussion goes on if you are convinced of it. But you're also coming off as, "This is what I got. You don't agree, well, I guess that's the end of the talk."

So both of you are in the wrong in a way, but at the same time, neither of you really did anything wrong. It was just a crossing of wires, so to speak, so can we try to get back on track and discuss this stuff? It is Void's message wall, so if you really want this to be closed, Void, I understand. But I think we can get somewhere if we try this again.