Thread:DazzlingEmerald/@comment-18812574-20151125221545

Daz, I know I'm not on the RPCQE committee or anything like that, but I want you to hear me out here for a second.

I believe your judgement on Dal's character was unnecessarily harsh, and not beneficial to the purpose of the RPCQE at all. You and I both know Dal, and both know what he can do, and both know that Chitose atm might be somewhat below par as far as Dal's articles usually go. And while I do agree with some of your points on some of the elements in the history section (ie, being older than the Soul King as not a great idea) I do not believe that warranted a five on the history section.

You want to know what article I passed with? Reika Hanaoka. It seems unfair to me that I was able to pass with that load of shit while Dal, who HAS been putting work and effort into Chitose, completely flunked the exam. This isn't a character critique: this is allowing the participant of the exam to pass on an at least 25k article that shows quality and thought. From there they can make further improvements as needed, but as-is you are shutting him down on, what I thought, was mainly personal opinion. Yes the article can be better. But does that mean it should fail the RPCQE? I think not. 