Board Thread:Captain's Council/@comment-2089817-20160507033741/@comment-1493741-20160507110815


 * Uno: Yeah, I don't think it should go away any time soon.
 * Dos: I agree, sometimes I get caught up in my own work, or get bogged down with real world work, that I don't notice the RPCQE has pending applications. A couple in the past I didn't touch because the author was just jumping in again and again whilst refusing to understand the problems of his article. Moving it over to forum threads would probably be better as a go-to.
 * Tres: I... don't like either system. Voting on it didn't seem to go anywhere in particular, and I'm pretty sure Prody was in charge of it before that. I had multiple characters end up "featured" just because I uploaded artwork of them to the site that week and garnered some attention to half-done or shitty articles. Also, Bored has a point. While, true, the user in control cycles from month-to-month, this doesn't really remove bias from the equation. You just have a lot more people nominating what they want to nominate, not necessarily because an article is really good.